Redesign of Common Lisp Controller
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 14:01, Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd at mailworks.org> wrote:
> Hello Desmond,
>
> On 01/12/10 03:10, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>>
>> ASDF2 has been mature. ?C-L-C is basically a thin wrapper now. ?I plan
>> to remove some redundant features from c-l-c and related packages.
>
> This is a good idea and a path that I would have followed if RL was not
> preventing me from contributing at the moment.
I always welcome your contribution.
>
>> - Remove clc-(un)register-user-package.
>> - Remove (un)register-common-lisp-implementation.
>
> Don't forget the 'Breaks' that you will have to issue against all previous
> CL packages, as removing these scripts will in fact break them.
>
> Migration to this new system can be tricky...
Thanks for reminding me. That's important.
>
>> * About clbuild
>>
>> Personally I don't like clbuild. ?I think a library installer such as
>> clbuild should work in user space, you can put its code in a directory
>> like ~/bin. ?So clbuild will be removed.
>
> There is a use-case for a 'global' clbuild: if you are the admin of for
> example a student server and you want to offer a stable library of CL
> packages for users...
>
> We should retain some way for the admin to install CL libraries in a global
> manner.
But there is no 'standard' way in the CL world. Clbuild is just one
of them. As I said, they can be uploaded as new packages.
Here is my opinion:
- /usr/share/common-lisp/... for APT
- /usr/local/share/common-lisp/... for admin
- /var/lib/... for 3rd party managers installed by system
- $HOME/... for 3rd party managers installed by user
Thanks,
Des
Reply to: