Re: Package conflicts, breaks, and problematic upgrades... with irqbalance
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 07:14:38PM +0000, Zach Marano wrote:
> irqbalance is supposed to spread interrupts across all CPU's but in GCE
> (and from what I recall KVM as well) it ends up assigning all interrupts to
> CPU0. It may be considered broken except that it was originally meant for
> bare metal hardware and therefore- maybe its not actually broken in a
> virtual environment?
Sure it is broken if it does no sensible things. If it can't do
anything, it should be a no-op and do nothing.
> With irqbalance on a 32 core VM:
> for i in $(seq 0 300); do grep . /proc/irq/$i/smp_affinity /dev/null
> 2>/dev/null; done
This looks for me like it just does not manage to balance anything.
However, I just started a system on GCE with 64 cores, installed
irqbalance and are greeted with this:
So it does something.
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome",