how do you want your britney commits (unfinished)
- Subject: how do you want your britney commits (unfinished)
- From: niels@thykier.net (Niels Thykier)
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 06:36:00 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] d568fa3e-102a-59e6-8aa3-e4e8e6ba9ba1@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <c87ed9cb-db41-177c-49f1-6ff4e5b1410b@debian.org>
- References: <8d6f7b6b-daf1-33ca-6e85-bdc953a2c77c@debian.org> <3bd2d6c5-0a0e-2dee-d494-51f896f9adbf@thykier.net> <c87ed9cb-db41-177c-49f1-6ff4e5b1410b@debian.org>
Paul Gevers:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi,
> On 12-09-17 22:15, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Paul Gevers:
>>> - adjust britney2 to not block on autopkgtest failure but instead adjust
>>> the required age depending on the results (lower for pass, raise for
>>> regression)
>
> Do you already have an idea in mind how this could/should be
> accomplished? While going through britney, I see several (most, if not
> all, of them hacky) ways this can be done.
>
At the moment, no, I do not have a brilliant idea.
Short term/for testing purposes, I would just add a comment in the
excuses and then leave the aging as it is.
> One idea of mine is to create an internal urgency that the age policy
> can take to adjust the age. If that is the case, I guess I have to make
> sure the order of policies is correct. Minor point, but was it your
> intent to change to know urgency ages? Or e.g. age to 20 days, which is
> no urgency age, when regressions pop up?
>
> Paul
>
I think we would prefer modifying the age-requirement over urgency
fiddling. Among other because changing the urgency is "exclusive" so we
cannot have multiple policies altering the aging in that case.
But I do not really have a good way of doing it atm. (either way)
Thanks,
~Niels
Reply to: