Re: emacs,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 09:16:43PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 08:38:55AM +0800, zw@zhaoway.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Thomas Chan wrote:
> > > But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
> > > it does have 8B50 as U+95AA). I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
> > > GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
> >
> > that is why computer could enhance our lives. but it surely
> > depends on the standard writers' moral consciousness.
> > so, thanks gb2312. (i won't use gbk soon, lucky :)
>
> ¡¡¡¡¾Ý³Æ£¬Big5 HKSCS Ïã¸ÛÔö²¹×Ö·û¼¯Ö®ËùÒÔÓÐÕâ¶Ñ´Ö¿Ú×Ö£¬ÊÇΪÁË
> ¾¯²ìÂä¿Ú¹©Ê±Ê¹Ó㬶ø²»ÊǸøÒ»°ãÊÐÃñʹÓõġ£ÒòΪûÓÐÁËÕâЩ×Ö£¬
> Âä¿Ú¹©Ê±£¬¾Í·ÇÓÃÆ´Òô²»¿É£¬Ò»À´Âé·³£¬¶þÀ´¡¸´Ç²»´ïÒ⡹£¿ :-)
> ѧУ¿Ï¶¨²»»á½ÌÕâЩ×Ö¡£ :-) ÎÒ¿ÉÄÜÊǹª¹ÑÎÅ£¬ÎÒÔ¼ÂÔ¿´¹ý
> HKSCS µÄ×ÖÐ͵µ£¬¾ÍÊÇÕÒ²»³öÀïÃæµÄ´Ö¿Ú×Ö¡£ :-)
ÕâÊÇ×îÉî²ãµÄ½Ì»¯,ËüÃÇÈÃÄã¸ü±¾Ã»°ì·¨È¥Ë¼¿¼ ²»ºÏÀí µÄ¶«Î÷,±ÈÈç˵,
Èç¹ûÎÒÃÇÒÔºó¶¼Ê¹ÓÃÓïÒôÊäÈëÁË,µ±ÎÒÃǶÔ×Å»°Í²Ëµ ËûÂèµÄ µÄʱºî,
ÓïÒôÊäÈëÈí¼þ/Ìå,×ÜÊÇÓÃÒ»ÖÖƽºÍµÄÓïµ÷ÎÊÄã Äú˵ʲôÄØ? ÏëÏë¿´
ÄǸöʱºî,ÎÒÃÇËùÓÐÈ˶¼ÔÙÒ²²»ÄÜ˵ ËûÂèµÄ ÁË,¹þ¹þ!¶àôºÃ°¡!
²»¹ýµ½ÄÇÒ»ÌìÀ´ÁÙµÄʱºî,ÎÒÏëÎÒÒ»¶¨»á°Ñ¼ÆËã»úÈÓ½ø»¯·à³Ø,
È»ºóÅܵ½´ó½ÖÉÏ´óÂîÒ»Éù Diao3, Ö»²»¹ýËùÓеÄ·È˶¼ÒªµÉ×ÅÎÒ
ÐÄÏë Õâ¸öɵ Bi1 Ôõô¿´¼ûÒ»Ö» Äñ Ò²Òª´ó¾ªÐ¡¹Ö!
Æäʵ Free Speech ¸ù±¾¾ÍÊǹ·Êº,ÒòΪÄãÒÔΪÄãÔÚ±í´ïʲô×ÔÓÉÑÔÂÛ,
¿ÉÊÇÄãµÄËùν×ÔÓÉÑÔÂÛÈ«ÊÇÓÉ·ÊÔíÏ´¹ýµÄ GB2312 ¹¹³ÉµÄ.
Ëùν×ÔÓÉ˼Ïë,¾ÍÊÇÂúÄÔ×Ó·ÊÔíÏ´µÄ·º°×µÄ GB2312 ¹·Êº.Õâ¶Ñ¹·Êº
µÄΨһºÃ´¦¾ÍÊÇÄãÔÙҲû°ì·¨Ëµ ËûÂèµÄÕâ¸öDiao3ÊÀ½ç.ÇÆ,¶àºÃ!
µ±È»ÄãÒ²±ðÒÔΪÓÃÓ¢Óï¾ÍÔõôÑù,³ý·ÇÄ㲻װʲôƴд¼ì²é,ÄãÏë,
Ò»¸öÓÐ Á¼ÐÄ, ÓÐ ÔðÈÎÐÄ µÄÆÀд¼ì²éÈí¼þ/Ìå,»áÈÃÄã°ÑÒ»·âº¬ÓÐ
buggery ºÍ beastiality ÕâÑùµÄ´ÊµÄ email ·¢Ë͵½ÍøÉÏÂð? ÄãÔõ
ôÄÜÖªµÀ debian-chinese-{gb,big5}@lists.debian.org µÄ¶ÁÕßÀï
ûÓÐδ³ÉÄêÈËÄØ?ÔÚÃÀ¹ú,ÕâËƺõÊǽРCDA: Communication
Decency Act,ͨѶ·ç»¯·¨°¸.½á¹ûµÄÈ·Èç´Ë°¡,±¾À´ÐÔȤζÕý³£µÄÎÒ
ÏÖÔÚÒ²ÖªµÀÁË beastiality ÊÇ ÊÞ¼é µÄÒâ˼,²»ÐÒÖ®ÖеÄÍòÐÒÊÇÎÒ
Éí±ßËùÓеÄÓ¢Óï×ÖµäÀﶼûÓÐÊÕ buggery Õâ¸ö´Ê.
Reply to: