Re: emacs, ??????????
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 zw@zhaoway.com wrote:
> 题外话,刚刚我又给自己的好奇心给恶心了,不过我也借此机会明白了
> 为什么大陆的 GB2312 要好过 Big5, 比如 GB2312 里面没有 牛逼
> 的 bi 字, Big5 里面却有这个脏字... 哎, 您可千万别去试啊,您
> 知道就知道,不知道就算了,我可不愿意把您给恶心了... :)
>
> 不过 GB2312 还是不够完美,比如GB2312里面还有 鸟 字,这个字在
> Window 里面还没有给过滤掉, 不过这里又得说说 Debian 的好了,
> XCIN 的拼音输入法里面就没有这个字.实在是好啊,以后所有用上
> Debian 的朋友都不会说脏话了,他想说 Diao, 也只能说 鸟.多好!
> 不然的话,我也想 file a bug report 了, ... :)
I'm not sure which "diao" you want to say--is it U+5C4C (Big5's CE78; not
in GB2312) or HKSCS's 8B4D (not in Big5, GB2312, nor Unicode 3.0; looks
like men2 'door' and xiao3 'little')? :)
But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
it does have 8B50 as U+95AA). I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu
--
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-big5@lists.debian.org
| and converted from big5 to gb2312 by an automatic gateway.
Reply to: