Re: emacs, ??????????
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Thomas Chan wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 zw@zhaoway.com wrote:
> > ²»¹ý GB2312 »¹ÊDz»¹»ÍêÃÀ,±ÈÈçGB2312ÀïÃ滹ÓÐ Äñ ×Ö,Õâ¸ö×ÖÔÚ
> > Window ÀïÃ滹ûÓиø¹ýÂ˵ô, ²»¹ýÕâÀïÓÖµÃ˵˵ Debian µÄºÃÁË,
> > XCIN µÄÆ´ÒôÊäÈë·¨ÀïÃæ¾ÍûÓÐÕâ¸ö×Ö.ʵÔÚÊǺð¡,ÒÔºóËùÓÐÓÃÉÏ
> > Debian µÄÅóÓѶ¼²»»á˵Ôà»°ÁË,ËûÏë˵ Diao, Ò²Ö»ÄÜ˵ Äñ.¶àºÃ!
> > ²»È»µÄ»°,ÎÒÒ²Ïë file a bug report ÁË, ... :)
>
> I'm not sure which "diao" you want to say--is it U+5C4C (Big5's CE78; not
> in GB2312) or HKSCS's 8B4D (not in Big5, GB2312, nor Unicode 3.0; looks
> like men2 'door' and xiao3 'little')? :)
I'm saying diao3 in xcin-2.5.1.99-pre3/cin/zh_TW.Big5/pinyin.cin
(there is only one) don't look at it if you don't wanna be offensed. :)
BTW, this character is in Chinese Dictionaries in Mainland. And used
at least in processing ancient Chinese writings. (what a pitty :( but
fortunately we could clean up 'em with the help of GB2312 now. :) and
left people all wondering what's wrong with that bird? :D
> But even Unicode 3.0 does not have HKSCS's 8AE3, 8B4D, 8B4E, nor 8B4F (but
> it does have 8B50 as U+95AA). I guess one can rank the "dirtyness" as:
> GB2312 < Big5 < {GBK, Unicode 3.0} < Big5HKSCS. :)
that is why computer could enhance our lives. but it surely
depends on the standard writers' moral consciousness.
so, thanks gb2312. (i won't use gbk soon, lucky :)
Reply to: