Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 17:03 +0200 schrieb Daniel Baumann: > > that's wrong, sorry. > > additionally, it's common understanding that unless you explicitly > express that something is licensed under 'GPL $version, or later', it's > only distributable under 'GPL $version'. or in other words, in genereal > you are, unless explicitly expressed otherwise, not allowed to choose > the version of the license. Quoting GPL: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." - I don't think that the path of a file validates as specifying a version number. If you want to reply, you may want to move the discussion to debian-legal, since this is off-topic here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil