[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ping on CD would not take up any additional space



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/24/2007 08:40 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:46:14PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
>> 	ping is not exactly the smallest of the programs (~30K), and I 
>> really trust d-i team judgement, I was just imagining that if it is 
>> possible to have ping (which means that space and other things are not a 
>> problem), we should add it for our users.
> 
> There is _no_ reason to exclude ping because of concerns about its size!!
> 
> I have just compiled the udebs both without and with ping. Adding ping 
> makes the busybox binary larger by 1568 BYTES or 800 BYTES depending on the 
> udeb:
> 				busybox binary size:	with ping:
> busybox-floppy-udeb/bin/busybox		 74404		 75972
> busybox-udeb/bin/busybox		201228		202028
> 
> In the packed udeb, the difference is a whopping 678 bytes or 472 bytes:
> 
> 					.udeb size:	with ping:
> busybox-floppy-udeb_1.1.3-4_i386.udeb	 45920		 46598		
> busybox-udeb_1.1.3-4_i386.udeb		118896		119368
> 
> BTW, when the .udeb is put on a CD, the ISO9660 filesystem will always 
> round up the required space to the next multiple of 2 kBytes. As it 
> happens, the addition of ping makes no difference at all when this is 
> considered:
> 				.udeb 2k CD blocks:	with ping:
> busybox-floppy-udeb_1.1.3-4_i386.udeb	23		23
> busybox-udeb_1.1.3-4_i386.udeb		59		59
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>   Richard

	That's great. Thanks for the nice report. :-)

	Now, the question would be if it is enough to convince Frans
and d-i team to add ping back and if there is anything that we can
do to help on this.

	Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGByCCCjAO0JDlykYRAuknAJ9iu/wYtoN73BM1LR72a/4MRnpmUACgkY2S
LN059AI00K1wIvq7kLKaGR0=
=jAlv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: