Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?

To: Steve McIntyre <stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: ken_yap@users.sourceforge.net, debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
From: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:02:33 +1000 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.20.0112221358250.15485-100000@azure.dstc.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011222021925.O514@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Steve McIntyre wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:53:58PM +1100, ken_yap@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
hmm,

i ran my rsync against cdimage after initially creating these images
using the PIK.  they matched the md5sums at the time.. i'll check
again.

i'm currently sitting about 12,000km away from my desktop and on hols

so it'll take a little while to do anything about this at planetmirror
and mirror.aarnet..
cheers,

-jason

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
  - From: ken_yap@users.sourceforge.net

References:
- Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
  - From: Steve McIntyre <stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
Next by Date: Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
Previous by thread: Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
Next by thread: Re: 2.2r4: is binary-sparc-1_NONUS.iso really an ISO image?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread