[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

slinkcd v 0.95 m68k & Alpha organization

> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hmmm. The du output from these runs is a bit suspect. Either m68k and
> alpha are smaller than i386,
> du output:
> du-alpha:561009 ./slink1
> du-m68k:470363  ./slink1

Yup, found the same thing. This brings up an interesting point;
do you want to treat each arch the same?  The m68k and Alpha have
fewer packages, and binary will probably fit on on disk. (famous last words)

My m68k (disk1) came out as:
 480266240 Dec 23 20:32 m68k.slink1.raw
and Alpha was:
 572381184 Dec 23 08:05 slink1.alpha.raw

I have not tried changing slink.list1 to try to fill up
the first disk more....perhaps after santa goes home.


Felson's Law:
	To steal ideas from one is plagiarism;
      to steal from many is research.
Microsoft! Which end of the stick do you want today?
Jim Westveer ------------- jwest@netnw.com
phone -------------------- 425-392-0141

Reply to: