[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 8 installation



On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:16:09 +0100
Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> wrote:

> Adam Wilson wrote:
> > I don't even think I'll need ZFS.
> 
> Though once you've tried it, the snapshots feature especially, you
> might never want to use anything else!
> 
> > What filesystems does GNU/kFreeBSD
> > support? In the installation videos/screenshots I have seen there
> > were options for UFS, FAT, and nothing else. The filesystem front
> > was a bit limited. Is UFS decent? Is it the BSD equivalent of ext2?
> 
> UFS resembles ext2, although there is a faster, journalled mode more
> like ext3/4.  If you create separate partitions for /usr, /home, etc.
> then journalling is enabled for all except / (where it doesn't work
> yet fully).
> 
> kfreebsd has a loadable kernel module for ext2/3;  I'm not much
> familiar with it.  It might possibly work as a root filesystem but I
> doubt anyone has even tried that before.  Similarly there is a
> reiserfs module I've never tried.
> 
> I don't think FAT would be much use as a root filesystem ;)  But it is
> available and useful for removable storage like USB/SD mass storage.
> NTFS is also available via fuse, a little harder to configure but it
> does work.
> 
> Also there are network filesystems:  SMB/CIFS and NFS.
> 
> > Does the installer partitioner use BSD terminology (slices,
> > partitions, etc.) which I have always found a bit confusing, or
> > DOS/GNU/Linux terminology (just drives and partitions).
> 
> The installer allows to choose MSDOS, GPT, BSD or possibly other
> disklabels.  IIRC it uses MSDOS partitioning by default, unless the
> disk is very large then it may choose GPT by default.
> 
> With MSDOS disklabels the device naming is like this (with Linux
> equivalent shown in brackets) :
> 
>     Primary:	/dev/da0p1 (/dev/sda1)
>     Extended:	/dev/da0p2 (/dev/sda2)
>     Logical:	/dev/da0p5 (/dev/sda5)
> 
> > I have a relatively new (circa 2010+) Nvidia GT 540 M, which works
> > well with nouveau. I suppose the Sandy Bridge integrated graphics
> > will have to do then if I go ahead with this.
> 
> You may be the first to try those chipsets, so I don't know what to
> expect, please let us know if you do.  glxinfo and Xorg.0.log may have
> useful info.
> 
> > What's laptop support like? My only computer is an ASUS N43SL,
> 
> Again, probably nobody has tried on that exact hardware.  Works great
> on my Thinkpad at least.  The hardware you listed looks very friendly
> to the free open-source drivers in kfreebsd (just as on Linux).
> 
> Wireless networking should work, but probably needs some manual setup
> with ifconfig and/or wpa_supplicant.

I do this anyway (don't trust NetworkManager, grrr...). wpa_supplicant
is my friend, and never fails me.

Attachment: pgph0duT5Vujz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: