Hi, > Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org> wrote: > > Thanks for your explaination. So we know now, that it is not easy > > fixable within the mlt source code. > > > > @Dan: > > Would you merge his patch? I didn't really intend for my patch to go upstream. It is a rushed fix until GNU libc headers or some other kfreebsd header can provide this. Although, that could take many months or years. Dan Dennedy wrote: > I prefer to merge a different patch I shared previously that excludes GNU > kFreeBSD but should still permit FreeBSD. > [...] > +#if !(defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) && defined(__GLIBC__)) If you are happy to patch this in upstream code, yes you would need to do exactly that to not break this on 'real' FreeBSD. Thank you, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature