Re: Plan B for kfreebsd
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:41:18 +0000, a écrit :
> Practically it would be an 'official Debian port', and we'd have all the
> usual things like install media.
I wouldn't call it "official", but I agree on the rest. Getting hurt
by sid bugs is always a pain, and you can not have users that way. And
having a port in the normal infrastructure flow helps a *lot* to get
maintainers at least try to fix their packages, instead of leaving all
the tudy to the porter team.
Samuel
Reply to: