Re: Plan B for kfreebsd
Christoph Egger wrote:
> It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided
> hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.
That's annoying.
To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an
unofficial repo, and that doesn't sound like something DSA could use.
Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no
security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are
therefore none of their machines DSA?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Reply to: