Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

To: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>, GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:34:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 54197FCA.5080101@pyro.eu.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87lhpig4qm.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de>
References: <[🔎] E1XU6hW-0006TQ-6C@franck.debian.org> <[🔎] 87zjdyg99l.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de> <[🔎] 87lhpig4qm.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de>

On 17/09/14 07:06, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> writes:
>> GRF. that should have been experimental. Are we there to just switch or
>> should I do a rollback (probably adding an epoch or so)?
> 
> Fixed for now?

I don't think the 10.1 package could have built in sid due to
unavailable build-deps, it probably would stay FTBFS.  But yes it is
fixed now.

Thanks,
Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org

Reply to:

References:
- freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
- Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: sys/sdt.h in zfsutils
Next by Date: Processing of zfsutils_10.1~svn271683-1_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Processing of freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-2_source.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread