Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

To: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:06:57 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87lhpig4qm.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zjdyg99l.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de> (Christoph Egger's message of "Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:29:10 -0700")
References: <[🔎] E1XU6hW-0006TQ-6C@franck.debian.org> <[🔎] 87zjdyg99l.fsf@mitoraj.siccegge.de>

Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> writes:
> Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> writes:
>> Accepted:
>> Distribution: unstable
>
> GRF. that should have been experimental. Are we there to just switch or
> should I do a rollback (probably adding an epoch or so)?

Fixed for now?

  Christoph

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>

References:
- freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>

Prev by Date: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Next by Date: Processing of freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687+really10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Re: freebsd-utils_10.1~svn271687-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread