Re: [kfreebsd] massive report for uninstallable FUSE packages

[Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>]

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 09:38:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> After receiving some feedback which allowed me to improve the
> template, this is the message I intend to use for the bug reports:
> 
> Package: %package%
> Severity: important
> User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> 
> Hi
> 
> This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it
> depends unconditionally on fuse-utils.
> 
> If %package% depends on fuse-utils only to ensure that FUSE support is enabled,
> please consider adjusting the dependency to something like:
> 
>   Depends: fuse [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any]
> 
>   (example uses "fuse" because fuse-utils is now a transitional package that
>   depends on fuse)

I think it should be ',' instead of '|' here, there is no need for
alternative, the architecture conditionals already do the job.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net