Re: DKMS support

To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: debian-bsd <debian-bsd@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: DKMS support
From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:28:13 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAOfDtXNEXDyOoYgx=8gOtd4svomg-23RYOZP1ufg26g_-DBT7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.GSO.1.10.1107160120400.6818@multics.mit.edu>
References: <[🔎] CAOfDtXO1MbOGspgTkh9Lt4DRmtuFsRppOyhEm-4+7hya0QdsDQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] alpine.GSO.1.10.1107160051520.6818@multics.mit.edu> <[🔎] alpine.GSO.1.10.1107160120400.6818@multics.mit.edu>

2011/7/16 Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>:
> Upon further reflection, this mostly boils down to whether Policy requires
> that kFreeBSD kernel modules build with bsd.kmod.mk.

Not all modules do this, see for example virtualbox.

-- 
Robert Millan

Reply to:

References:
- DKMS support
  - From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
- Re: DKMS support
  - From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
- Re: DKMS support
  - From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: DKMS support
Next by Date: [kfreebsd] massive report for uninstallable FUSE packages
Previous by thread: Re: DKMS support
Next by thread: Re: DKMS support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread