Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate
> > > as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state?
> With my DSA hat on I have to say that I'm not entirely happy with what
> we have so far.
> The biggest pain for us currently is that puppet just does not work
> reliably on kfreebsd (both i386 and amd64). This may be a ruby bug, but
> it's still really, really annoying.
Do DSA have any other major concerns about maintaining kfreebsd-*
machines? (You said puppet is the biggest, so I assume there are others
of some size)