Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate
> > as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state?
> From the server point of view, I think we reached something close to
> other debian-ports, with even some added features like ZFS. On the other
> hand I have to agree that on the desktop point of view, there are still
> problems, which may break the expectations users have from a stable
> release. The desktop is usable though.
With my DSA hat on I have to say that I'm not entirely happy with what
we have so far.
The biggest pain for us currently is that puppet just does not work
reliably on kfreebsd (both i386 and amd64). This may be a ruby bug, but
it's still really, really annoying.
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/