Re: conflict with ioctl.h and ioccom.h?

[Konstantinos Koukopoulos <kouk@noc.uoa.gr>]

On Sat 18 Nov 2006 14:07, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > While going through some of the packages in NOTES [1] I noticed that the
> > darkice package is FTBFS again after being claimed fixed. It used to be
> > FTBFS because of bad build-deps but now it is something different:
> > from the build log [2]:
>
> It looks like we are currently doing the same thing :-(
>
> Look at r1727 on
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/?op=log&rev=0&sc=0&isdir=1

I see. Well I suppose we should be doing different things then, maybe I'll 
focus on the packages with no bug in BTS. Btw darkice's build-deps need the 
same fix for kfreebsd-amd64 and hurd-i386 as it did for kfreebsd-i386. Should 
I reopen the bug and add this information?

Kostas Koukopoulos