Joel Baker dijo [Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:08:42AM -0600]: > (...) > That's the situation with the NetBSD port as it stands. I'm happy to > discuss whether it should be "Debian GNU/NetBSD/i386" or simply "Debian > NetBSD/i386", but if we're going to dredge this up again, I'm going to have > to insist on someone providing actual citations, rather than assertions > (well, okay, RMS or FSF folks could assert it, since that's what the > citations would be to...) I think in this case labeling our NetBSD port as GNU/NetBSD would not only be out of respect for RMS's wishes - it can help clarify what exactly are we doing. Calling it just 'Debian NetBSD' will bring us lots of people asking us what difference does it have from 'just NetBSD'. Calling it 'Debian GNU/NetBSD' will, IMHO, tell at least part of them what is this about. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.cx - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Attachment:
pgp6km71UBpbt.pgp
Description: PGP signature