> I do like the idea of following the freebsd (i think net and open bsd
> may do this too) convention of putting everything that's not part of
> base in /usr/local/whatever - debian tends to put stuff in /usr for
> the most part - most of the debian systems i've worked on have barely
> anything in /usr/local
In Debian, /usr/local is reserved for things not covered by the Debian
packaging system. E.g. I have a Debian system running dhcpd 3.0rc10,
which is not available as a Debian package, so I deinstalled the Debian
dhcpd and put my own in /usr/local.
> i suppose this confused me at first (having so much stuff in
> /usr/local/whatever) but it makes it easier to tell what stuff you've
> added, and it's easier to upgrade the base system via cvsup.
This is, of course, not necessary once you use the Debian packaging
> it is annoying tho when you have something that's installed locally
> but is also part of the base system (ie bind, ssh or whatever) as
> it's pretty hard (afaik) to remove a package that's part of the base
> system in bsd.
That's one of the main motivations for this project... everything is a
package in Debian. Well, almost everything.
"I wanted to change the world. But I have found that the only thing
one can be sure of changing is oneself."
-- Aldous Huxley
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
- Re: hmm...
- From: Will Yardley <email@example.com>