Re: results
resultsI'm willing to give a hand on the website development and maintance.
If you have any problems with the hosting let me know, I'll work something
out.
* http://www.debianbox.org *
----- Original Message -----
From: Andreas Krennmair
To: Debian-BSD Mailinglist
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:22 AM
Subject: results
As I didn't get more emails, I counted all votes and computed the
results.
Results
~~~~~~~
1. kernel
NetBSD kernel 59.259 % (16 votes)
FreeBSD kernel 29.629 % (8)
OpenBSD kernel 7.407 % (2)
Darwin kernel 3.703 % (1)
2. userland
GNU utilities + very system dependent userland utilities 95.45 % (21)
"native" userland + some GNU utilities 4.55 % (1)
only the userland that came with the kernel 0.00 % (0)
Comments
~~~~~~~~
I think the result's pretty clear, the majority prefers NetBSD, mostly
because of its portability (Debian on a VAX or a Dreamcast would be
great fun, eh? ;). Some also said that FreeBSD would be better in terms
of speed. The userland results are even more clear, the only reason I've
read is that this is the only possibility to do it "the Debian way".
What's Next
~~~~~~~~~~~
So, what's next? We first need some webspace to build up a website. Do
we get any webspace from Debian? If not, we should consider putting the
website on sourceforge.net. Who wants to maintain the website?
Next, I'm going to post a list of all packages needed for the base
system also with some points to be discussed.
Regards,
Andreas Krennmair
--
Ganz zaertlich macht's der Kabeljau
heimlich dem Pottwal seiner alten Frau
Der Pottwal selbst ist impotent
wie gut, dass sie vom Jau das stramme Kabel kennt!
Reply to: