The reason to go with BASH is because it is *very* good. Yes it mgiht be easier to start with ash but I don't think that would give most of us what we want. I know I would not be happy without bash and given the poll results I think most people would agree with me. On the whold bootloader issue I think just adapting the one that NetBSD uses would be better along with a *good* filesystem (I'm thinking XFS as opposed to Resiser though) On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:24:02AM -0700, Michael Goetze wrote: > bash - The GNU Bourne Again Shell > > Mightn't it be easier to start with ash? I mean, it's originally from > NetBSD, and it's the shell on the Debian Rescue Floppy, so it's one of > the points of contact between the two worlds. -- BOFH excuse #181: Atilla the Hub
Attachment:
pgpyowtnRn6FZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature