[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

On 2021-01-25 19:57:18 [+0100], Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Not really *much* easier, to be honest. I can definitely build a package
> locally given a source debdiff, or slightly better, given a source
> package I can run dget against (since we're talking about new upstream
> releases, by the looks of it), and do whatever testing with the
> generated packages built into d-i and/or fetched from the network as
> required (similarly to what's done for the various kernel udebs).
> IOW that can be tested before even having to make a decision regarding a
> possible acceptance into p-u.

in case it helps, I uploaded

| $ sha512sum openssl-pu.tar 
| 1a3df2e37aa9312a378046691794bf7d7d72570ed9ade7ffbf50f87c8c8a7dd5e671a7f704fc4f1ebdbada1dda3007a5db24b426deefd33fff39b81e7be38aa3  openssl-pu.tar

containing the source package and amd64 packages.

> Cheers,


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: