Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

[Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>]

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:39:13PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-11-24 20:18:15 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> > At some point, could we please have a combined / single diff between
> > the current 1.1.1d-0+deb10u3 and the proposed 1.1.1h-0+deb10u1 (I
> > assume)?
> 
> Please find attached the diff between 1.1.1d-0+deb10u4 and the proposed
> 1.1.1i-0+deb10u1.
> 
> The i release in unstable managed to migrate to testing. It was blocked
> due to ci by m2crypto and swi-prolog. The swi-prolog issue got fixed in
> unstable (the testuite was updated) and is not an issue in stable (the
> package builds, the testsuite gets ignored).
> The m2crypto issue is a different story and is still open in BTS
> (#977655). I *think* someone added an override or the ci-system was kind
> to Kurt/me and looked the other way :)
> The m2crypto package in stable and bpo will FTBFS with the updated
> openssl package.
> 
> I'm not aware of other issues.

I think there are at least 2 upstream issues since the 1.1.1i
release we want to fix first. As far as I know, they haven't been
fixed upstream yet.


Kurt