Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 21:06 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-01-16 19:14:53 [+0100], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > So I went over the open issues and pull requests, and currently
> > don't see a reason not to upload it to unstable with those 2
> > patches. I don't know about any other regressions in 1.1.1.
> The openssl package migrated to testing.
> I would prepare the pu package for Buster. Should I post here the
> complete diff or an incremental containing only the new patches?
Both would be good, please.
FWIW we're also fighting the clock (yet) again, as we're now a week
away from the freeze for the 10.8 point release. ("Yay"!)
> Once the openssl pu is acked I would open a pu for m2crypto. Or
> should it be done now? (just asking).
Assuming that a patched m2crypto will also build fine against openssl
1.1.1d, then there's no reason that the two shouldn't proceed in
parallel (i.e. feel free to file the m2crypto request already).