Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 21:06 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-01-16 19:14:53 [+0100], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > So I went over the open issues and pull requests, and currently
> > don't see a reason not to upload it to unstable with those 2
> > patches. I don't know about any other regressions in 1.1.1.
>
> The openssl package migrated to testing.
> I would prepare the pu package for Buster. Should I post here the
> complete diff or an incremental containing only the new patches?
Both would be good, please.
FWIW we're also fighting the clock (yet) again, as we're now a week
away from the freeze for the 10.8 point release. ("Yay"!)
> Once the openssl pu is acked I would open a pu for m2crypto. Or
> should it be done now? (just asking).
Assuming that a patched m2crypto will also build fine against openssl
1.1.1d, then there's no reason that the two shouldn't proceed in
parallel (i.e. feel free to file the m2crypto request already).
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: