On 2021-01-22 16:38:28 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Assuming that a patched m2crypto will also build fine against openssl > 1.1.1d, then there's no reason that the two shouldn't proceed in > parallel (i.e. feel free to file the m2crypto request already). Yes, it does. Bug filled. Thank you. > Regards, > > Adam Sebastian