Re: RfC: New LVM volume size restriction prompt
Hi,
Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
> > > Another glitch is, that one string
> > > ---snip-----
> > > #. Type: string
> > > #. Description
> > > #. :sl3:
> > > #: ../partman-auto-lvm.templates:11001
> > > #, no-c-format
> > > msgid ""
> > > "Hint: \"max\" can be used as a shortcut to specify the maximum size, or "
> > > "enter a percentage (e.g. \"20%\") to use that percentage of the maximum size."
> > > msgstr ""
> > > ----snap------
> > > is not synced to translators material at all.
> > > Don't know why ATM.
> >
> > We will see this evenning, what l10n-sync does now ...
>
> This is still a problem.
> The string mentioned above is still not synced correctly to translators
> material. (I have ran l10n-sync without --commit option, otherwise it would
> have removed that string from translators material, where I have added it
> by hand this morning.)
> Something weird is going on ...
> Will have to investigate.
This was mostly a mis-interpreting of mine.
The string mentioned above _IS_ indeed added to the ../po/sublevelX/
structure for translators, but it is in sublevel2, not in 3, even though in
partman-auto-lvm it is said to be in sl3.
That's because partman-partitioning has the identical string, and there it
is said to be in sl2.
After this discovery, I ran l10n-sync again with commit rights, and now it
looks fine.
Cheers
Holger
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 9 " S T R E T C H " .
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Reply to: