[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Archiving the attic folders from d-i for ports

First, thanks for all you do!

You said salsa or github. I strongly prefer gitlab, not that I have ever used salsa. I have used gitlab, but that is not my objection. Simply: I use github and do not want to have yet another site and profile and ...

Then again, if you are just archiving, not creating a new project, then neither site is appropriate. Git is for projects which will have active development. Now I have said too much, you will do what is best!

On April 26, 2018 11:37:25 PM EDT, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>(Re-send because I forgot debian-ports-devel@alioth is dead,
> please reply to debian-boot@)
>I was pointed at Steve's mail yesterday mentioning that he moved
>the non-attic repositories of debian-installer to salsa [1].
>Since there are still some repositories that we need for debian-ports
>in the attic, I was wondering whether we should take care of the
>attic stuff and move it over to salsa or github.
>FWIW, we are in the progress of moving the sparc* and ppc* ports
>which aren't on GRUB yet fully over. In fact, GRUB works fine on
>all SPARC boxes we have tested so far, so at least silo-installer
>won't be needed anymore in the future. Still, I think we should
>archive everything.
>> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2018/04/msg00253.html
> .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
>`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
> `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
Reply to: