[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release



On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:01 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
[...]
> > >  * rebuilt d-i to match that kernel
> > 
> > You know there are patches around for that.
> > 
> > >  * X drivers
> > 
> > I don't see backports for them.
> 
> libdrm2: 2.4.68-1~bpo8+1
> libgl1-mesa-.*: 11.1.3-1~bpo8+1
> xserver-xorg-video-intel:2:2.99.917+git20160522-1~bpo8+1

As I understand it, xserver-xorg-video-modesetting should be used
instead of xserver-xorg-video-intel, for chips supported by the i915
kernel driver.  So the latter should be changed to limit the device IDs
it claims, then both of them should be backported.

[...]
> So for radeon hardware enablement, there is 1) the proprietary driver

fglrx is dead upstream and removed from unstable.  (It's still in
jessie-backports, but should be removed there as well.)

[...]
> Also, I imagine this might one day be necessary,
> particularly if tracking backported linux-src due to ABI changes
> between kernels, eg: if the out-of-tree drivers in testing begin to
> require >> linux-src=3.16.0 ABI.

I think you mean API.  We don't ship out-of-tree drivers as binaries.

> Ben, could you please lend your insight into this point?
[...]

I don't know what the question is.  I have no involvement in
maintenance or testing of out-of-tree drivers, other than occasionally
checking whether they build against the current kernel version and
filing bugs on those that don't.

Ben.

-- 

Ben Hutchings
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
                                                               - John
Lennon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: