Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (2015-05-17): > On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > My personal stance on kernel related things would be “upstream first”. > > If it ain't going to be merged into mainline, or at least accepted as a > > patchset (like e.g. aufs3 or rt in wheezy) for src:linux, I'm not sure > > we want to support that. > > > > Cc-ing debian-kernel@ to see what they think. > > I strongly oppose adding OOT modules this way as a supposed workaround > for licence incompatibility. Just to clarify: I didn't mean to suggest doing so to work around any license issues. I was just trying to mention an alternate way for stuff that aren't (going to be) in mainline and that might still land in Debian kernels. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature