Bug#764982: Backports, where is the danger (why the FUD)
On Apr 20, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com> writes:
>>
>> Good for you. Maybe it's better now, but my opinion still stands.
>
> Well, that's a jolly constructive attitude, well done.
Not how I meant it, but thanx for misunderstanding. I meant that my opinion
about back ports still stand. For that reason and all the others that's been
mentioned.
> If everyone adopted such a position, we'd never get anything done now,
> would we?
Of course we would. And so would the user(s). User opt-out is always better
than forced opt-in. Right? This is the same thing. Users should know what
they're in for and have to choose to enable this themselves. It should
not be 'forced' upon them...
Reply to: