also sprach Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> [2013.04.07.2257 +0200]:
> AFAICT you're the only one having such an issue with the
> mount/umount dance (it might be suboptimal as far as
> “performances” are concerned, but that's certainly not serious);
> having that issue with grub-installer, which already got
> a fix-or-workaround in the meanwhile, makes me think it's nowhere
> like a serious bug.
So there is a "dance" being performed for no apparent reason, and
you prefer to hack a fix into grub-installer rather than to fix the
root's cause?
What if the next d-i component fails, will you hack it too?
I can demonstrate how I can break d-i using only the preseed.cfg
file's interface and you don't consider this serious?
Attached is the log you wanted. I could not find anything therein.
The d-i is from the mirrors at
stable/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot downloaded
yesterday and updated today.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
(on the statement print "42 monkeys"+"1 snake") btw,
both perl and python get this wrong.
perl gives 43 and python gives "42 monkeys1 snake",
when the answer is clearly "41 monkeys and 1 fat snake".
-- jim fulton
Attachment:
syslog.xz
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)