[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: building and testing d-i with jenkins



Hi,

Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
> ok, I've renamed the d_i_manual_$LANG jobs to d_i_manual_$LANG_html and 
> created all d_i_manual_$LANG_pdf, which are triggered by success of their 
> d_i_manual_$LANG_html job. 
> 
> And, all new d_i_manual_$LANG_pdf jobs resulted in "unstable" builds due to 
> the four warnings each of them has:
> 
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log-Architecture: hurd
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log:Warning: The following formats failed to build: 
> pdf
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log-Architecture: hurd-i386
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log:Warning: The following formats failed to build: 
> pdf
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log-Architecture: kfreebsd
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log:Warning: The following formats failed to build: 
> pdf
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log-Architecture: linux
> d-i_manual_de_pdf/builds/1/log:Warning: The following formats failed to build: 
> pdf

1. the error for arch hurd-i386 was a real error, which I fixed some minutes ago
(for en).

2. the other errors are no real errors. The architectures "hurd", "kfreebsd" and
"linux" are no 'real' architectures in the meaning of manual-building:
"hurd" is "hurd-i386", "kfreebsd" is "kfreebsd-i386" or
"kfreebsd-amd64" and "linux" is one of "amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc, ...".
So, "hurd", "kfreebsd" and "linux" are kernels, no architectures, and are 
to be omitted for the builds.
I don't know, why Jenkins tries to build those 'architectures'.
Do you use the same scripts/methods to build, which are also used for 
regular package building? Or do you trigger all those builds by
separate, custom commands?


Holger W.

-- 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2
    under  D e b i a n   G N U / L I N U X   6.0  ( S q u e e z e )
        Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


Reply to: