Re: Proposal to add patches to netcfg (#682737)
please consider to add this
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433568
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:27:24AM +0200, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote:
>> Yes, I can do that starting from Thursday, I'll try to bring it to a
>> mergeable state and also [hope I will be able to :)] add config for
>> ipv6.
>
> That's great! Feel free to ask any questions. Apart from Michael Biebl's
> mail there's also this bit from him to consider aswell (paraphrased from
> IRC logs): "Auto $foo" isn't the current naming scheme anymore. n-m
> currently uses "$essid (auto)" even for the filename, with the auto
> being automatically and magically shown translated. One could maybe also
> use "(d-i)" or "(install)".
>
>> Other than that,I think that the nm-write* part and the logic for the
>> finish-install script should remain the same. For merging, I would go
>> with adding the changes manually, somehow seems easier at the moment
>> :)
>
> Yeah, trying to merge it was painful. And that was also the better
> approach for the large IPv6 patch set where merging was just not really
> possible anymore.
>
> Kind regards
> Philipp Kern
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20121029215814.GA28868@hub.kern.lc">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20121029215814.GA28868@hub.kern.lc
>
--
YunQiang Su
Reply to: