Hi, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:30:01AM +0300, Sorina - Gabriela Sandu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote: > > Quoting Sorina - Gabriela Sandu (sandu.sorina@gmail.com): > > > >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682737 > >> [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/netcfg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/people/sorina/write_config > >> [3] http://swarm.cs.pub.ro/~sorina/debian/images/08_14_write_config.iso > >> [4] http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager/developers/settings-spec-08.html > > > > > > Just as Phil Kern did for IPv6 support, could you move these changes > > to feature/write_config? That would allow me to review debconf > > templates without doing so in your "private" branch. > > Sure, here it is [1]. > > [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/netcfg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/feature/write_config it seems that the refactoring for IPv6 broke this patch set in many ways. Sorina, do you have time to do a replay of your patches against the current netcfg master? If not, please speak up. If so, too. ;-) Currently installation with network-manager is broken because of an additional ifupdown option set in /etc/network/interfaces. Given that I introduced that I get to keep the pieces, but obviously we should "just" merge your branch so that network-manager can get rid of the naïve blacklisting script. (Merging seems to be horrible. I think the most sane way is to replay the patches through rebasing and then check for errors. The main change is that most of the state got encapsulated into a "struct netcfg_interface".) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature