Re: Recurrent "old builds" for D-I
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 04:17, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaudenz@debian.org):
>> Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011:
>> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
>> > > Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds as....this just
>> > > makes everybody ignore them after a few days.
>> >
>> > We might try to have this mail reversed sorted by failure date. So the
>> > most recent failure will always be show at first item.
>> >
>> > Another thing we might have is a mail, for the arch, on the day of
>> > failure and a summary in weekly basis.
>> >
>> > Comments?
>>
>> In principle I agree to both. The problem is that this probably means
>> that the current scripts have to be rewritten from scratch. As I'm not
>> really a Perl Hacker and prefer Python. Would anybody oppose if
>> I'd do this in Python?
>
>
> I wouldn't call this a priority.
>
> The current concern is more having the builds that are supposed to
> happen....
>
> Rewriting the scripts may be nice but they're doing their job, after
> all.
As Christian say's it can be done but not a high priority thing.
No objection in doing it on python :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Reply to: