Quoting Frans Pop (firstname.lastname@example.org): > On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > > None of these will trigger the possibility of a double entry in the > > language list, so I think that the problematic test can be dropped. > > OK. Should we maybe add a test that a valid locale "ll_CC.*" exists for the > combination, so that we avoid adding really weird entries like en_NL or > de_VI, but do add the ones we want like de_LI, nl_BE, en_IE? It certainly can't hurt, sure...
Description: Digital signature