Quoting William Pitcock (nenolod@dereferenced.org): > lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and > the widespread availability of alternatives. > > I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will be > gone by June. This is a heads up mail for the D-I team. Don't we have some install paths that still depend on LILO? Anyway, even if we don't, I think we should track that lilo removal and coordinate with William, in order to stop providing lilo-installer. And, I think this should be mentioned as a release goal (dropping lilo). Either high priority if we have install paths depending on lilo, or normal priority otherwise.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature