[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Suggestions for improving the (Xfce) Desktop install

On Wed,18.Mar.09, 23:04:25, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2009-03-18 at 18:59 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> writes:
> > 
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > Good point, but the change need to be made in tasksel, so it's not
> > > irrelevant to discuss that in tasksel lists. But maybe it'd be even
> > > better to discuss that on a bug reported against tasksel? What do you
> > > think Andrei?
A bug seemed a bit annoying for this, especially since I wasn't sure 
about the package.

> > I belive the right place to discuss it is in xfce mailing list and after
> > a conclusion has been made, report a bug against tasksel (with a patch
> > if possible) for us to update it.
> > 
> > Obviously if we think something is wrong we'll ask and discuss it in the
> > bug report but a lot of noise could be avoided if doing this way. And it
> > will also speedup things for you all.
> Ok, if it's fine with you :)
> Andrei, could you please post a summary to pkg-xfce mailing list, with
> what you think would be nice to have or nice to not have on the xfce
> task? I'll provide my input (maybe in beginning of april because I'm
> going to not be around until end of march) and then we'll provide
> tasksel a patch with the all the data, when 4.6 have ended in unstable
> etc.

Ok, will repost in pkg-xfce list after I've tested ristretto ;)

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: