[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx> writes:

> Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
>> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
>> > using X11 instead. 
>> Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
>> - the X server,
>> - evdev input module and
>> - a framebuffer video module.
> humm ... i am just a dumb debian user, but, besides the size, the gtk
> direct framebuffer implementation was made also because of performance
> issues related with having the Xserver loaded, right? (not only because
> disk space)

I fear that if no one step ahead to maintain the directfb backend we'll
end without any other option.

        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Reply to: