Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
> > using X11 instead.
>
> Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
> - the X server,
> - evdev input module and
> - a framebuffer video module.
>
humm ... i am just a dumb debian user, but, besides the size, the gtk
direct framebuffer implementation was made also because of performance
issues related with having the Xserver loaded, right? (not only because
disk space)
> Anything else?
>
> Bastian
>
> --
> Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge.
> -- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
>
>
Reply to: