Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
> > using X11 instead.
> Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
> - the X server,
> - evdev input module and
> - a framebuffer video module.
humm ... i am just a dumb debian user, but, besides the size, the gtk
direct framebuffer implementation was made also because of performance
issues related with having the Xserver loaded, right? (not only because
> Anything else?
> Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge.
> -- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2