On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:59:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Frans Pop (elendil@planet.nl): > > > It is actually a side-effect of my changes to get rid of all those > > annoying perl warnings. I forgot that mdadm has a debconf template while > > making those changes. > > Hmmm, reading this, I understand that there are situations where mdadm > templates are used during the installation. > > If we follow the theory that drove us up to now, it means that mdadm > should be added to one of the D-I "levels", similarly to xorg, samba, > popcon and a few other "regular" packages that are likely to display > something during some kind of installs. > > I would then be tempted to add mdadm to "level 4" as it will be used > only in some "specific" situations. Am I right ? mdadm is installed on every system using software RAID partitions. The templates allowing one to define software RAID partitions in mdcfg-utils are in sublevel 3. That would make mdadm sublevel 3 to me, but mdadm should not ask questions at high priority, so sublevel 4 would be fine, if I did get a proper grasp of the logic beyond sublevels… :) Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio .''`. lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature