On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:59:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elendil@planet.nl):
>
> > It is actually a side-effect of my changes to get rid of all those
> > annoying perl warnings. I forgot that mdadm has a debconf template while
> > making those changes.
>
> Hmmm, reading this, I understand that there are situations where mdadm
> templates are used during the installation.
>
> If we follow the theory that drove us up to now, it means that mdadm
> should be added to one of the D-I "levels", similarly to xorg, samba,
> popcon and a few other "regular" packages that are likely to display
> something during some kind of installs.
>
> I would then be tempted to add mdadm to "level 4" as it will be used
> only in some "specific" situations. Am I right ?
mdadm is installed on every system using software RAID partitions.
The templates allowing one to define software RAID partitions in
mdcfg-utils are in sublevel 3.
That would make mdadm sublevel 3 to me, but mdadm should not ask
questions at high priority, so sublevel 4 would be fine, if I did get a
proper grasp of the logic beyond sublevels… :)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature