[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Abandoning lowmem level 1



Frans Pop wrote:
> I don't really see that having lowmem 1 or 2 makes that big a difference 
> from a user perspective. Users with boxes with that little memory will 
> probably be savvy enough to handle lowmem 2 anyway.

Not installing standard priority udebs by default is still a big
usability issue in lowmem 2. AFAIK.

And non expert users do install d-i on lowmem machines. The nslu2 users
are notably the ones that get bit by lowmem level 2.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: