Frans Pop wrote: > IMO a difference of 4 MB is not really worth the testing effort, nor does it > make any real difference to users. So I propose to just get rid of the > distinction between lowmem level 1 and 2. The only reason I can see to keep it is that the levels might change in the future. If level 1 drops below 32 mb, there will be a good reason to want it. Or if level 2 raises above 48 mb, we'll want level 1 again. Both of these seem unlikely at the moment, but it's hard to tell.. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature