Bug#474698: partman-base: Inconsistent output if sector size != 512 bytes
Otavio Salvador <email@example.com> writes:
> Frans Pop <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>> I could go on to replace PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT with dev->sector_size
>>> throughout partman-base/parted_server.c, but I'm getting suspicious.
>>> Isn't there a good reason for this state of affairs?
>> Looks like this could possibly be a bug introduced by revision r37468 ,
>> which changed PED_SECTOR_SIZE to PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT (partman-base 84).
>> Looks like that change was made for compatibility with libparted 1.7.
>> Whether changing it to dev->sector_size is correct depends of course on what
>> the actual definition of PED_SECTOR_SIZE was in prior libparted versions.
>> It could also be that the problem has always been there and that the use of
>> PED_SECTOR_SIZE was always not correct (though maybe only in some places).
>> This certainly needs to be checked very carefully. A good start could be to
>> check whether the Sarge installer also has the bug as that has older
>> versions of libparted and partman-base.
>> Otavio: you did that change; any comments?
> I'll look into it. Nothing from the top of my head.
did you find the time to look into this?
* Support for logical sector sizes not equal to 512
Does parted 1.8.8 exhibit the same problem? I managed to compile it,
but can't start on a ramdisk:
# ~/installcd/parted/parted/parted /dev/ram1
Error: Error opening /dev/ram1: Invalid argument