Thanks for the review! On Friday 29 June 2007 18:21, Christian Perrier wrote: > I'd shorten it to: > > Template: grub-installer/fakeraid > Type: boolean > Default: true > Description: Install the GRUB boot loader to the fake RAID disk? > Installation of GRUB on a fake (ata) RAID disk is experimental and is > always done onto the Master Boot Record of the fake RAID disk. > . > The GRUB root device is: ${GRUBROOT}. Agreed. Now that I've added the template in partman-dmraid the rest is redundant. Added some additional info about current support. > Template: grub-installer/fakeraid-error > Type: error > Description: Unable to configure GRUB > An error occurred during the setup of GRUB for the fake RAID disk. > . > The installation of GRUB is aborted. OK. > We already have a few occurrences of "<foo> is aborted" so that makes > sense. We're not completely consistent here as we also use "has been > aborted" and even a few "will be aborted". I think the simpler the > better and we should probably rephrase occurrences of "will be" and > "has been". Agreed. I've used "will be" here. > I personnally prefer "for the fake RAID disk" instead of "for *your* > fake RAID disk". Cosmetic change, though. Disagree. "your" is used in other grub-installer templates too; it's a lot more natural. > _Description: Continue with partitioning? > The support for fake RAID disks (using dmraid) in the installer is > experimental. You should make sure that you have a backup of any > data on your system that you do not want to lose. > . > There is currently no real support for fake RAID devices in either > the partitioner or the boot loaders. The installer works this around, > but it means that the installation is not completely straightforward > and that there are some important limitations. > . > More detailed information about fake RAID support and how to use it, > especially during partitioning and boot loader installation, can be > found at: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FakeRaid. > . > Please read that page carefully before proceding. > > I suggest removing the exclamation mark. The warning is proeminent > enough. I have left the first one, but removed the second. > Anyway, this last template should disappear, right? Or do you think > we'll keep it? Eventually, yes. > I have a doubt for "works around this" or "works this around"....:-) The first is correct.
Attachment:
pgp0WvPRqFE2e.pgp
Description: PGP signature