[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#421692: marked as done (Install report ETCH)

Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 07:04:59 +0200
with message-id <20070502050459.GQ30071@kheops.homeunix.org>
and subject line Bug#421692: Install report ETCH
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: <How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network?>
Image version: <Full URL to image you downloaded is best>
Date: <Date and time of the install>

Machine: <Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)>
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred>


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [E]
Detect network card:    [o]
Configure network:      [o]
Detect CD:              [0]
Load installer modules: [o]
Detect hard drives:     [o]
Partition hard drives:  [o]
Install base system:    [E]
Clock/timezone setup:   [o]
User/password setup:    [o]
Install tasks:          [o]
Install boot loader:    [o]
Overall install:        [o]

Comments/Problems:

 The initial install refused to active X.   After checking the net
without result I re-installed having the same result without X
Remembering having read about dpkg-reconfigure I did so and this time
declined the offer to include a software frame buffer as well as the
hardware for my Nvidia card.   The install completed and I now have a
functional system, with 2.6.18-486 kernel built with module assistant.
I do not however have a functional version (APT) of BLENDER (2.4.a) I
think? I just have a bouncing icon which disappears after several
seconds without starting the program. Everything else is great!

Except Blender..... Geeeee whiz..... Darn it!

<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
      and ideas you had during the initial install.>


-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to submit@bugs.debian.org.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Quoting Geert Stappers (stappers@stappers.nl):
> tags 421692 notabug
> thanks


 ?

This bug should either be closed or reassigned to X packages (noone
will probably be able to do anything if the video card isn't really
supported) but certainly not tagged with an invalid tag and kept in
D-I bugs.

Given that this installation was complete I think that closing the bug
is the best option. Another bug should be reported against X packages,
with the appropriate information (type of video card, X logs, etc.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: